Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Thursday, February 25, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Monday, February 22, 2010
Bookmark and Share

We've published a brochure titled, "This Is A Fight For Your Life", for you to download, copy and distribute to friends and family to help Manfred's campaign.

Click on the link below to download...

http://www.imwithmanfred.com/portals/2/manfredbrochure.pdf

Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Bookmark and Share

John Boehner's claim to fame for the past two decades is that he doesn't do earmarks.

But in 2008, when Mr. Boehner was campaigning for the passage of the Troubled Asset Relief Program on behalf of his contributors employed by Morgan Stanley, the extra $112 billion in earmarked funds designated for special projects didn't seem to be much of a problem. Where was John Boehner's integrity when he was standing on the floor of the House of Representatives, clamoring about how be believed other conservatives should set aside their ideological purity and vote along with he and Nancy Pelosi for the passage of HR 1424?

Here's just 5 of the earmarks that John Boehner claims that he doesn't support, but campaigned for their passage:

HR 1424 Earmarks - Section 325 Extension and modification of duty suspension on wool products; wool research

HR 1424 Earmarks - Section 502 - EXTENSION OF EXPENSING RULES FOR QUALIFIED FILM AND TELEVISION PRODUCTIONS

HR 1424 Earmarks - Section 503 Exemption from excise tax for certain wooden arrows designed for use by children

HR 6049 Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 - SEC. 503. EXEMPTION FROM EXCISE TAX FOR CERTAIN WOODEN ARROWS DESIGNED FOR USE BY CHILDREN .

HR 1424 Earmarks - Section 310 INCREASE IN LIMIT ON COVER OVER OF RUM EXCISE TAX TO PUERTO RICO AND VIRGIN ISLANDS

HR 1424 Earmarks - Section 504 Income averaging for amounts received in connection with the Exxon Valdez Litigation

So once again we ask, is Mr. Boehner against earmarks because it serves to further his own political power base inside of the Washington Beltway?

Or is he simply against earmarks in his own district, but supports them for others?

Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Bookmark and Share

According to federal records, Morgan Stanley spent $610,000 lobbying members of Congress from October to December in 2008. During this time, Congressman John Boehner accepted $13,300 in funds from employees and PACS associated with Morgan Stanley to be used for political action and campaign contributions.

Morgan Stanley was one of the earliest recipients of money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, getting their first cash infusion from the Federal Government on October 28, 2008.

We must remember that it was John Boehner who campaigned for the TARP bailout bill when faced with opposition from other conservative members of Congress.

Thursday, February 11, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Manfred has a conversation with a young woman who lives in the district. She feels that there is no future in the Ohio 8th District, and has contemplated moving to Cincinnati or Columbus to find work.

Without supporting local projects and investment, and supporting trade policies that have sent thousands of jobs overseas and emptied our factories, our leadership has failed the voters of the 8th District.

Monday, February 08, 2010
Bookmark and Share

A major problem throughout the district is the lack of direct communication with John Boehner. Manfred wants to establish regular video conferences with each county, township, city, and village throughout the district. This way, the needs of the district can be identified and acted upon in a timely fashion. Through improved communication, Manfred believes that he can do a much better job of identifying the needs of the people in the district and act on behalf of the people he represents - not outside interests.

Monday, February 08, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Being of German descent himself, Manfred came to the United States through legal channels in the 1980s. Here, he talks openly about the issue of illigal immigration.

Tuesday, February 02, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Quite amusing. The Oxford Press ran an article on Monday, 2/1, about Boehner's visit to an 8th grade class. When he was asked about my challenge to his seat, his response was, "My focus is on trying to get our economy going and trying to create jobs."

If that is the case, then why hasn't he pursued any funding or investment for projects like the one we've discussed in New Paris?

Why hasn't he bothered to even send a thank you card or acknowledge companies from outside this area who have made investments in our communities?

Now you're campaigning in elementary schools Mr. Boehner? Why don't you take a trip to Preble County and face me in a direct debate challenge about what you've done for the district besides play golf two days a week?

Interesting comments on this article, reflecting everything that I keep hearing throughout the district.

Friday, January 29, 2010
Bookmark and Share

It's interesting that Mr. Boehner refuses to explore other options for funding a public works project that would represent significant benefit to the area as a whole. With such a demonstrable return on investment, why didn't Mr. Boehner at least help to find potential sources of grant funding within the budgets of many of the Federal departments like Transportation or Agriculture?

Meanwhile, other congressional representatives, even extremely conservative ones, have no problem fighting to bring money back to their district that helps create jobs and improve communities.

We pay taxes to the Federal government, and we need representation that will fight to bring back every penny possible.

There's no question that we don't want to bloat budgets, however this is how the system is currently wired to work, and this is what other representatives are doing to help their constituents.

John Boehner's refusal to bring money back to the 8th Congressional District is costing us jobs.

Until there is an overhaul of the system, I will work within the framework that exists to bring as much money back to our district to put people to work and enhance the values of all of our lives.

UPDATE!!!

On January 14th of 2010, the United Stated Department of Agriculture announced $49 million in funding for communities throughout the entire State of Alaska for the purpose of providing water quality improvement, sanitation, and job creation throughout the state.

Individual communities received as much as $5.9 million in funding for water-related infrastructure projects.

This is being funded directly by the Department of Agriculture - and NOT through special congressional earmarking.

Why isn't John Boehner pushing for these kinds of projects for his district in Ohio?

Department of Agriculture Press Release

Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Bookmark and Share

I recently spoke with Terry Pendergraft, of the Preble County Veteran's Services. The discussion was very sad, and frustrated me to think that our representatives have not made this issue a higher priority.

John Boehner has failed the veterans in our district. Our military men and women have made terrible sacrifices for this nation and others around the world.

No other obligation comes before the ones that we've made to those who have served to protect our freedom. If we can't keep our commitments to our servicemen and women, then we have no business making commitments to anyone else.

I promise to work hard to ensure that our veteran's issues are championed in Washington.

Sunday, January 24, 2010
Bookmark and Share

NAFTA and other free trade legislation has destroyed the conservative, working middle class in Ohio, and the rest of the United States. John Boehner is a staunch supporter of NAFTA, and works to promote the interests of global, multinational giant corporations. He uses scare tactics to threaten conservative, small business owners with threats of higher taxes if the small business community doesn't support this agenda of globalization. But what is good for giant corporations has not been good for small business owners.

Manfred Schreyer recognizes the distinction between the language used by globalists like John Boehner. When Boehner comes calling on small business owners, talking about policies that are pro-business, he's really talking about policies that are good for his giant, multinational patrons - which have clearly not been good for the conservative, middle class, small business owners who are not international players.

It is imperitive for small business owners to recognize that when John Boehner, and other pro-free trade representatives are talking about what is good for business, they're talking about what is good for giant corporations that have no loyalty to the United States, our economy, or our friends and neighbors. We cite the example of Halliburton moving to Dubai as a perfect example.

As a small business owner, can you afford to pull up stakes and move your operation and family to another country to take advantage of the policies that John Boehner promotes?

If you cannot, then you must support Manfred Schreyer, who opposes the current policies that are bleeding the middle class customer base of every small business in our region.

Sunday, January 24, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Watch this video and get to know Manfred.

Thursday, January 21, 2010
Bookmark and Share

I Am a Republican Because...

• I believe the strength of our nation lies with the individual and that each person's dignity, freedom, ability and responsibility must be honored.

• I believe in equal rights, equal justice and equal opportunity for all, regardless of race, creed, sex, age or disability.

• I believe free enterprise and encouraging individual initiative have brought this nation opportunity, economic growth and prosperity.

• I believe government must practice fiscal responsibility and allow individuals to keep more of the money they earn.

• I believe the proper role of government is to provide for the people only those critical functions that cannot be performed by individuals or private organizations and that the best government is that which governs least.

• I believe the most effective, responsible and responsive government is the government closest to the people.

• I believe Americans must retain the principles that have made us strong while developing new and innovative ideas to meet the challenges of changing times.

• I believe Americans value and should preserve our national strength and pride while working to extend peace, freedom and human rights throughout the world.

• Finally, I believe the Republican Party is the best vehicle for translating these ideals into positive and successful principles of government.

- Haley Barbour, former Republican National Committee Chairman, c. November 1994

Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Mr. Boehner telling the rest of the Republicans in Congress to abandon solidarity and the Contract With America. It's every man for himself?

What a curious strategy in hindsight. It didn't work out so well did it.

http://www.nysun.com/national/house-gop-leader-eschews-contract-with-america/82397/

Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Bookmark and Share

The popular political blog site, POLITICO.COM reported that in 2009, Representative John Boehner spent $82,998 on golf outings.

We especially find it interesting that he headlined 100 events in the year. That's a lot of social time.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29881.html

Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Bookmark and Share

In September of 2008, John Boehner appeared with Chris Dodd on ABC'S This Week to discuss the proposed Wall Street bank bailout package known as TARP, or the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

During the interview discussion, Boehner disagreed with using any additional funds for homeowner mortgage assistance calling it "partisan politics" and suggesting that it didn't need to be part of the TARP bill.

Boehner wanted to give Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson the “powers as quickly as possible,” and further went on to state, “There are a lot of well-meaning, well-intentioned ideas out there, but they don’t need to be part of this package,” in reference to putting in assistance for average working families.

DODD: I think there’s going to be a strong interest to deal with the Main Street aspects of this.

BOEHNER: But we’ve already dealt with that, when we passed the housing bill last summer. I didn’t vote for it because of the $300 billion bailout for scam artists, and speculators, and others around the housing industry. But there are a lot of tools in there to help the Federal Housing Administration deal with the foreclosures problems that’s out there. We need to rise above partisan politics…and deal with this as adults.

Now pay very close attention to his statements. He says that private individuals were taken care of back in the summer of 2008 with the Housing Bill. He says, "we passed". But he admits to not voting for it because he claimed the $300 billion was to help out "scam artists, speculators, and others around the housing industry."

So, he was in favor of cutting the people out of the TARP package because he only wanted to bail out people associated with the mortgage industry, but he voted against a bill designed to provide direct relief to homeowners because he didn't want speculators and scam artists to get any.

Who are these speculators and scam artists? In his reference to the Housing Bill, he made it sound as if he were talking about the investors and financial institutions. But in voting for the Wall Street bank bailout and demanding that private homeowners not be included in that relief effort, he made it clear.

Not only is Mr. Boehner against bringing any money back to the 8th District of Ohio to help create jobs and foster development projects that will grow our regional economy, he was very specific about not wanting homeowners to have any mortgage relief in either the Housing Bill of 2008, or the TARP Bill.

He clearly wanted our tax dollars for Wall Street, and none for homeowners.

I will work for the good, taxpaying people of the 8th District of Ohio. It's time we sent a message to politicians who want to use our money to bail out their friends on Wall Street, but refuse to bring anything back to the people of the 8th District.

Monday, January 18, 2010
Bookmark and Share

Why is Mr. Boehner working so hard to convince other Republicans to bail out Wall Street with our tax dollars, but he flatly refuses to bring any of the billions of dollars being spent in D.C. to create jobs and invest in bringing our local economy back to prosperity? The people of the 8th District in Ohio deserve better.

Sunday, January 17, 2010
Bookmark and Share
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Bookmark and Share

EATON, Ohio (January 18, 2010) – Longtime Eaton-area resident and businessman, Manfred R. Schreyer, has formally announced his campaign bid for the Republican seat in this spring’s primary race for the 8th District of Ohio. This seat is presently held by longtime incumbent, John Boehner.

“The people of the 8th District of Ohio did not send John Boehner to D.C. to become the professional fundraiser for the rest of the Republican Party. We sent him there to represent the people of the 8th District,” says Manfred, “We all have friends who have lost their jobs and been forced to tighten their belt because of the economic crisis.”

Manfred believes that without a fundamental challenge to the guiding philosophy behind the leadership in the 8th District, Ohio will continue to suffer. He states, “Boehner has presented a conflict in his leadership. He made some early commitment to not bring any earmark investments back to our district from D.C. in protest of the political system.”

 “But, in September of 2008, Mr. Boehner stood in solidarity with Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank by voting to bail out the bankers with our tax dollars, and then Boehner went further to publicly scold other conservatives who refused to go along with the scheme by saying ‘Now is not the time for ideological purity’,” states Manfred.

Manfred asks, “What is ideologically pure about Mr. Boehner telling other Republicans to agree with Pelosi by voting to give our tax dollars to the bankers, but then refusing to work to help bring jobs back to the people in his district?”

Schreyer states, “I realize that Mr. Boehner still enjoys some support in the GOP. However, the primary vote is when we define the direction of the party, and I believe that stubborn refusal to compromise with our neighbors has brought us to this era of extremist views. It might be working for West Chester, but it’s not working out very well for the rest of the 8th District.”

Saturday, January 16, 2010
Bookmark and Share

I have decided to run for Congress in the Republican Primary Election this spring. We already have a solid team, and a surprising level of grassroots support for this campaign.

My primary reasons for running are:
1.        I do not believe our present representation in Washington D.C. has a substantial focus upon our district, and has shifted his focus to politicizing the media promoted issues vs. pursuing an agenda to represent the 8th District of Ohio.
2.       Our present representation has refused to modify his leadership approach in these trying economic times, and bring money back to the district for investment in projects and job creation.
3.       The present representation has voted to use our tax dollars to support giant corporations on Wall Street with bank bailouts, but simultaneously refused to support legislation to help ease the economic pressures on the middle class.
4.       Our current representative has become a professional fundraiser for the Republican National Committee, spending more than 100 working days fundraising on the golf course in 2009.
5.       The 8th District was already in trouble before the economic downturn with the erosion of our job base and middle class that was brought on by free trade policies that are staunchly supported by our present representative, who makes no distinction between us small business owners and giant, multinational corporations.
I already understand that this is a David vs. Goliath effort here, but I do not believe that Mr. Boehner is representing the people of the 8th District in D.C., and if we don’t do something different, nothing is going to change.
I Will Focus On The Issues And Needs Of Those Within Our District
So why do I claim that John Boehner’s focus is on national politics and not our district?
Let me give you an example.
Recently, I had the honor of spending some time with Terry Pendergraft at the Preble County Veteran’s Services office. He gave me some examples of the kinds of cases he’s presently dealing with in his office.
It’s well known that the Veteran’s Administration continues to drag their feet in helping our vets with the benefits that have been rightfully earned. But Congress has not acted to force the VA to stop shredding case files, and clean up its act.
Right here in Preble County, we have a widow of a husband that had already been rated at 100% disability, and had been receiving benefits for years before he passed on. She is now going to lose her home because the VA stopped sending benefits payments when her husband died, and they have not acted to remit her portion of his pension – a simple process that used to take 30-60 days.
She is in foreclosure because she lost all income and nobody is championing her cause through the proper channels in D.C.
Nothing has been done by Congress to fix this problem with the VA. Our representative, the minority leader, is more content to play pundit to the White House in national media than champion issues here in his district.
I Will Work For The People In The 8th District Of Ohio
John Boehner spent over 100 days on the golf course conducting fundraisers for other Republicans in 2009, and seems more interested in being the national spokesperson for the Republican National Committee.
This might be great for the RNC, but it’s not working for the widow in Preble County, nor is it working for a lot of people in the 8th District of Ohio.
We turn on the news and see Mr. Boehner in the national spotlight, but issues are being ignored in his own backyard.
We need Congressional leadership that is connected with the district as a whole, not just a small, affluent neighborhood in southern Butler County and the D.C. Beltway.
We need Congressional leadership that will focus on the needs of the Congressional District.
I Will Modify My Leadership As Conditions In Our District Require
We all remember Mr. Boehner’s tirades against earmarked funds, and his open refusal to bring any back to our district.
None of us truly want to increase the federal deficit, and bloat the budget with “pork spending”.
But let’s face reality here, for 18 years, we’ve been sending our taxes to Washington while the rest of the nation had representatives who fight to bring federal money back to their districts.
We have financed everyone else’s projects, and Mr. Boehner has enjoyed building his own personal, political power base at our expense.
At less than 2% of the entire federal budget, earmarks represent a miniscule percentage of the spending that goes on in Washington.
But these funds can sometimes be the lifeblood of a region when it comes to stemming the blood loss of jobs and people.
Southern Butler County might not be feeling the effects of the economic crisis as badly as the rest of the district, which further emphasizes that as a whole, the district requires leadership that is in touch with the voters.
I Will Bring Balance With More Support For The Working Middle Class
I have documented on my campaign website http://www.imwithmanfred.com an interview with John Boehner on ABC’s This Week in September of 2008.
In this interview, Mr. Boehner explained how he wasn’t interested in adding any kind of support for homeowners in the TARP (Trouble Asset Relief Program) Bill, also known as the “Bank Bailout”.
He said the issue had already been handled back in the summer of 2008 in the Housing Bill, but quickly added that he didn’t vote in favor of the Housing Bill either.
He didn’t want any support of homeowners in the TARP Bill, and voted against support for homeowners in the Housing Bill, but he was loud in his support for Wall Street and the banks.
We have a video clip of Mr. Boehner standing on the floor of the House of Representatives, admonishing other conservative Republicans to vote yes on the TARP bill. In fact, Mr. Boehner was quoted in the press as saying, “Now is not the time for ideological purity.”
So, he abandoned his conservative, ideological purity to encourage other Republicans to support TARP, but refused to do anything about supporting the middle class?
I Will Balance Support For Global Corporations With Support For Small Business
This would be acceptable if it were the only issue on the table, but all one has to do is drive through industrial areas of our district to see the effects of other economic policies that Mr. Boehner has staunchly supported.
Middletown, Hamilton, Eaton, Troy, all of these areas have lost a substantial number of middle class, living wage jobs as a result of free trade policies. Manufacturers have sent jobs overseas, which further trigged the loss of supply chain jobs and related service providers.
Every small business owner is impacted by the economic loss in the middle class, because there are fewer people in the regional customer base. The economic base has eroded as people have left the area to try and find work elsewhere.
We’ve bartered away our working middle class.
That middle class is the economic engine that drives small business and without it, small business owners will continue to experience lower sales, as there’s no economic growth in the region.
I realized that when Republican leaders talked about being pro-business, they’re really talking about policies that are pro-multinational business, and not necessarily pro-small business.
Never before in history has there been any distinction, and we’ve always assumed politicians were referring to us small business owners as well in their support for business.
If that were truly the case, why would they be promoting policies that hurt our middle class customer base?
How many small businesses have been pushed out of operation because of their inability to compete with multinationals that enjoy the exploited labor of these oppressive, totalitarian regimes?
I Will Balance Support For Global Corporations With Support For Freedom And Liberty
Some say that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and other similar free trade policies are good for our nation because it brings cheap imports back that raises our standard of living.
Some argue that it’s free market economics at work, and private companies will seek the lowest variable costs to increase profitability.
While I won’t disagree with the push towards lowering costs and increasing profitability, I do challenge the notion that it’s free market economics in a pure, academic sense.
Many of these nations that we’ve rushed to establish trading relations can only offer an advantage through the exploitation of their people’s labor by repressive, totalitarian policies. Only by hammering individual freedoms and liberty can these governments maintain such economics.
Is this really free market capitalism?
And if by some stretch that you believe that this is the case, is any favorable economic policy more important than the fundamentals of freedom and liberty?
We’ve sent our troops all over the world to fight and die for freedom, yet we continue to create incentives for multinational corporations to benefit from human suffering. In the cases where standards of living are genuinely improved in these areas, we’re doing so at the expense of our own middle class back here at home. Where’s the balance?
My Commitments To You
I commit to the following:
* I will once again connect this district with Congress through comprehensive, active involvement, accessibility, and true representation.
* I will work to make sure that Federal funds are being brought back to this district before they go anywhere else.
* I will work to bring balance to policies that support small business and the working, conservative middle class.
* I will work to achieve consensus-based solutions, and not continue to polarize and politicize.
* I will work to establish a legislative agenda that defines policies favorable to small business and not just multinational corporations.
 
Many Republicans feel that we're doing the wrong thing by bringing a challenge to Mr. Boehner. However, I submit that a primary election is most certainly the time and place to define the direction of the Republican Party.
I  will continue to support our Republican candidates and the party as a whole. But I am in this for the long haul and will continue to push for better representation in our district until things improve.

I am focused and committed to a grassroots campaign to bring the changes that I’ve outlined in this letter.

Campaign Email Alerts

Get campaign news and announcements the easy way!


   

 



Bookmark and Share

Blog Categories


Authorized and paid for by the Manfred Schreyer Committee, 100 West Main Street, Eaton, Ohio, 45320, Jane Schreyer, Treasurer.

Federal law requires political committees to report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer for each individual whose contributions aggregate in excess of $200 in a calendar year. Do not send cash contributions. Political contributions are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. Donors, by sending a check or authorizing a PayPal transfer or a payment on their credit card, are affirming that: 1) They are not a foreign national who lacks permanent residence in the United States. 2) Their contribution is made from their own funds and not those of another. 3) They are making this donation for the 2010 election cycle.

Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
©2010 Manfred Schreyer Committee